“Our office is available 24 hours, 7 Days a week. Post Coronavirus, we mainly operate remotely and we are available in our office by appointment. We have several representatives available to take care of your needs however we understand the need to sometimes come into our place of business in order for you to meet with one of our Protection Specialists and discuss your concerns. We highly value the person to person relationship and are readily available to meet with you in person”.
888-995-6019 Office No Ext. 813-995-6013 x 101 Direct.
Email: info@centurioninsuranceafs.com

Appeals Court Overturns $366M FedEx Race Bias Verdict *Centurion Insurance AFS*

Feb 02, 2024 (0) comment , , , , , , , , , ,


A federal appeals court on Thursday threw out a $366.2 million verdict against FedEx in a case brought by a Black sales manager who said the package delivery company fired her in retaliation for accusing her supervisor of race discrimination.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the plaintiff, Jennifer Harris, was entitled to none of the $365 million of punitive damages that a Houston jury awarded her in October 2022.

It also reduced Harris’ damages for pain and suffering, mental anguish and inconvenience to $248,620 from $1.16 million, despite finding sufficient evidence to support her retaliation claim.

FedEx said in a statement that it remains confident that it acted properly regarding the termination of Harris’ employment and is pleased with the court’s decision to reduce the damages.

Harris’ lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The award against Memphis, Tennessee-based FedEx had been among the largest in a U.S. workplace bias or retaliation case involving a single worker.

Harris had worked for FedEx for more than 12 years, first as a sales representative and ultimately as a district sales manager, before being fired in January 2020.

She said her firing stemmed from her complaints about her supervisor, a white woman, who had given her a poor performance review and who Harris alleged had tried to demote her.

But the New Orleans-based appeals court said Harris did not meet the “heavy burden” under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 of showing that FedEx acted with malice or reckless indifference toward her, in the face of a “perceived risk” that its actions would violate federal law.

Circuit Judge Cory Wilson said the evidence suggested that the supervisor believed Harris should be disciplined for insubordination, not in retaliation for her complaints.

“For punitive damages, it is the employer’s subjective intent that matters,” Wilson wrote for a three-judge panel.

The case is Harris v. FedEx Corporate Services Inc, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-20035.

The most important insurance news,in your inbox every business day.

Get the insurance industry’s trusted newsletter


Source link

Comment (0)

Leave a Comments